IRS OFFER IN
COMPROMISE - IRM
|
|
Check out the competition about the IRS Offer in
Compromise program.. After you speak to them, contact TaxSOS.com
to resolve your case
Call TaxSOS.com Now Toll Free
1-866-482-9707 (1-866-4-TaxSOS) or
submit your Free
Tax Problem Consultation request |
5.8.3
Centralized Offer in Compromise Transfers, Perfection, and Case
Building
Manual Transmittal
May 14, 2013
Purpose
(1) This transmits a revision for IRM 5.8, Offer
in Compromise, Section 3 — Transfers, Perfection and Case
Building.
Material Changes
(1) This revision is a complete rewrite and reorganization of IRM
5.8.3.
(2) The procedures in this section of the IRM apply to the Process
Examiners duties in the Centralized OIC sites. Sections have been
removed from 5.8.2 and inserted in 5.8.3. All sections have been
renumbered and reorganized as appropriate.
(3) 5.8.3.2 incorporates Interim Guidance Memo SBSE-05-0213-011,
reissued on 02-01-2013.
(4) 5.8.3.3 previously 5.8.3.2- Added language for new AOIC Appeals
CDP procedures.
(5) Deleted former subsection 5.8.3.3, Processing
Offer Transfers Between COIC Sites.
(6) 5.8.3.4 - Added language for field transfer criteria and
timeframe to be used in field transfer letter incorporating Interim
Guidance Memo SBSE-05-0612-016, issued on 06-29-2012.
(7) 5.8.3.4 (2) added language to allow Combo A letter to be sent
to the taxpayer on cases being transferred to the field.
(8) 5.8.3.5 incorporates Interim Guidance Memo SBSE-05-1212-098,
reissued on 12-31-2012 on Securing Related Offers.
(9) 5.8.3.6 and 5.8.3.6.1 previously 5.8.3.4.1 and 5.8.3.4.2
incorporates Interim Guidance Memo SBSE-05-0213-010, reissued on
02-01-2013 defining case building and perfection of offers transferred
to the field and an added note to ensure correct DPC codes on any
payments.
(10) Deleted former section 5.8.3.6, Screen
for Obvious Full Pay, per Interim Guidance Memo
SBSE-05-0712-060, issued 07-24-2012.
(11) 5.8.3.7 and 5.8.3.7.1 incorporated Interim Guidance Memo
SBSE-05-0213-010, reissued on 02-01-2013 defining case building and
perfection for offers worked in the COIC sites.
(12) 5.8.3.8 - Added new subsection on requesting Estimated Tax
Payments as part of case building procedures.
(13) 5.8.3.9 - New subsection on the AOIC Combo letter. This
section was separated out from the previous 5.8.3.7.1 COIC
Case Building Actions.
(14) 5.8.3.10 previously 5.8.3.9.
(15) Deleted former section 5.8.3.11, Exception
Processing for Offers in Compromise Involving Taxpayers in Combat
Zones.
(16) 5.8.3.11 - Added new subsection on processing telephone
responses to Combo letters.
(17) 5.8.3.12 previously 5.8.3.10.
(18) 5.8.3.13 previously 5.8.3.8.
(19) 5.8.3.13.1 previously 5.8.3.8.1.
(20) 5.8.3.13.2 previously 5.8.3.8.2.
(21) 5.8.3.14 previously 5.8.2.5.1.
(22) 5.8.3.15 and 5.8.3.15.1 previously 5.8.3.12 and 5.8.3.12.1.
(23) 5.8.3.15.1 now titled Additional
Procedures for Dishonored Checks formerly Procedures
for Dishonored Payments When Offer is Still Assigned to COIC.
(24) 5.8.3.16 previously 5.8.3.13 Added language on manual refund
monitoring.
(25) 5.8.17 previously 5.8.3.14.
(26) 5.8.3.17.1 - Added new subsection, Expedite
Handling for Short Collection Statute Expiration Dates on Related
Offers.
(27) 5.8.3.18, 18.1,18.2, 18.3 previously 5.8.3.15, 15.1,15.2,15.3.
(28) 5.8.3.18.4 previously 5.8.3.15.4 - Added language on
requirements for Form 2848 representation on offers filed by joint
taxpayers.
(29) 5.8.3.19 previously 5.8.3.16.
Effect on Other Documents
This material supersedes IRM 5.8.3, dated 03-26-2010. This material
incorporates Interim Guidance Memos SBSE-05-0213-011, Centralized
Offer in Compromise Defining Case Building Procedures,
reissued on 02-01-2013, SBSE-05-0612-016, Interim
Letters for Offer in Compromise, issued on 06-29-2012,
SBSE-05-0212-098, Securing Related Offers,
reissued on 12-31--2012, SBSE-05-0213-010, Centralized
Offer in Compromise Case Building, reissued on 02/01/2013
and SBSE-05-0712-060, Centralized Offer in
Compromise (COIC) Screen for Obvious Full Pay Processing,
issued 07-12-2012.
Audience
SB/SE Collection and Campus Compliance employees.
Effective Date
(05-14-2013)
Scott Reisher
Director Collection Policy
5.8.3.1
(03-26-2010)
Overview
-
Process Examiners (PE) are responsible for making a
processability determination on all offer receipts, other than
those based solely upon Doubt as to Liability (DATL).
Processable offers are then perfected and built (i.e.,
internal and external information is secured to verify
financial information) before being assigned for
investigation. This chapter explains the procedures to be
followed for determining jurisdictional responsibility,
transferring cases, perfecting offers, and case building for
offers in compromise.
5.8.3.2
(05-14-2013)
Perfection and Case Building Timeframes
-
If an offer is received with payment(s), processability
must be determined within 24 hours of IRS received date and
case building completed within 16 days of Area Office, AO,
received date.
-
If no payment(s) is submitted, processability and case
building must be completed within 16 days of the AO received
date.
5.8.3.3
(05-14-2013)
Routing Cases Based on Jurisdictional Responsibility
-
Except for CDP offers meeting COIC criteria, for all cases
cited in the table below, generate and send the transfer
letter to the taxpayer and/or POA, if applicable. Ensure all
TC 480 or STAUPs have been input, as appropriate.
-
The following table provides guidance when it has been
determined that Collection does not have jurisdictional
responsibility:
5.8.3.4
(05-14-2013)
Field Cases – Identification and Transfer
-
Once the COIC sites have loaded the offer to AOIC and
completed initial processing and perfection, pending offers in
the following categories will be immediately transferred to
the appropriate Area Office to be worked in a field group:
-
Corporations
-
Employment Tax from Partnerships
-
Estates and trusts
-
Currently incarcerated taxpayers
-
Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP) – Doubt as to
Liability (DATL)
-
Personal Liability Excise Tax (PLET) - Doubt as to
Liability (DATL)
-
Any business with employees
-
IMF taxpayers involved in a closely held corporation
-
Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) and Limited
Liability Company (LLC)
-
IMF taxpayers whose primary source of income is from
a partnership
-
Sole proprietors with gross receipts over $500,000
-
International taxpayers
-
Offers worked by a field OS within the past 24 months
-
Docketed court cases
-
Offers involving court-ordered restitution
-
Department of Justice, see IRM 5.8.2
-
Prior to transfer to the field, COIC will generate the AOIC
transfer letter or Combo A letter and send to the taxpayer.
When preparing the letter, the PE must use 120 days as the
time frame for taxpayer contact.
-
All offers forwarded to Area offices for investigation will
be sent to a central point designated by the Area office.
5.8.3.5
(05-14-2013)
Processing Forms 656 and Initial Offer Payments
-
Taxpayers are required to include one application fee and
TIPRA payment or check the Low Income Certification box in
Section 4 of the Form 656 for each Form 656, Offer
in Compromise, submitted, other than those based
solely on DATL.
-
There should only be as many Forms 656 as there are
entities. In conjunction with an acceptance letter, the Form
656 constitutes a binding agreement between the government and
the taxpayer.
Example:
(1) Two taxpayers who jointly owe the same liability
(including spouses living separately or divorced) may submit
a joint OIC on one Form 656 showing each name, address, and
taxpayer identification number. However, separate OICs (one
for each person) may be submitted if the individuals deem it
to be appropriate for their particular situation.
Example:
(2) Taxpayers who owe both joint liabilities and TFRP
liabilities for the same quarters and the same amount, must
submit two offers.
-
There may be instances when a taxpayer sends in three
offers when only two are required. In those cases you should:
-
Add the applicable MFTs from the third offer to each
of the remaining two offers.
-
Treat any additional application fee and/or TIPRA
payment as a deposit (apply it to the 4710 account).
-
Inform the taxpayer, preferably by telephone, of the
actions taken.
-
Put an "X" through
the first page of the third offer and keep it in the
case file.
-
The table below is intended to assist in identifying a
processable offer for application fee purposes and provide
guidance on advising the taxpayer when more than one Form 656,
application fee, and/or TIPRA payment is required.
-
Individuals or self-employed taxpayers filing a DATC or ETA
offer should complete and attach Form 433-A(OIC), Collection
Information Statement for Wage Earners and Self-Employed
Individuals.
-
All other forms of business entities (partnerships,
corporations, limited liability companies, etc.) should submit
Form 433-B(OIC), Collection
Information Statement for Businesses.
Note:
Page 4 of Form 433-B(OIC) may not be required if
information provided by the taxpayer includes a current
Profit and Loss statement and/or sufficient information to
make a determination.
-
Taxpayers who submit an offer to compromise individually
owed tax and also have a substantial interest in an ongoing
business may be required to submit a Form 433-B(OIC) for that
business.
5.8.3.6
(05-14-2013)
Perfecting Field Cases
-
Certain critical errors in an offer must be corrected in
order to perfect the offer and enable the Service to begin the
offer investigation. For field cases, the only issues that
will be perfected are the following:
-
Additional Forms 656; related application fee and
TIPRA payment(s)
-
Balance of any TIPRA shortfall due at the time of
submission
-
The offer was submitted on an obsolete Form 656
-
The Form 433A(OIC) and/or 433B(OIC) is missing
-
Document the AOIC history to summarize any perfection
issues.
-
These cases must be flagged while in the hold file waiting
for the taxpayer's response.
-
Upon receipt of the response, the case must be immediately
pulled and shipped to the receiving field office.
-
If the taxpayer fails to perfect the offer, return the
offer without further contact.
Note:
PEs must ensure all payments received have the correct
Designated Payment Codes (DPC).
5.8.3.6.1
(05-14-2013)
Field Cases - Case Building
-
Case building for field cases should be minimal.
-
Prior to the transfer of cases to an Area office, COIC
will include in the case file prints of IMFOLT or BMFOLT or
a print of the Masterfile screen from AOIC.
-
COIC will generate the TC 480 and Status 71 through the
AOIC system. However, there may be situations when the
Status 71 cannot be systemically generated (e.g., MFT 31
modules created prior to January 2005, imminent statute,
etc.). In those cases where AOIC does not systemically
generate the appropriate TC 480 and/or Status 71, COIC must
manually input the appropriate codes.
Note:
If the TC 480 was manually input, it must be manually
reversed. The AOIC history should be notated to alert the
OE/OS that the TC 480 must be manually reversed at
closing.
5.8.3.7
(05-14-2013)
Perfecting COIC Cases
-
Prior to beginning an OIC investigation, certain critical
errors must be corrected to perfect the offer. The combo
letter on the AOIC system is designed to communicate with the
taxpayer and/or their representative to request the necessary
corrective action. If there is no response to the request
letter, the OIC may be returned with no further contact. A
return for failure to perfect an offer does not require a Form
1271, Rejection or Withdrawal
Memorandum. The taxpayer has no appeal rights when
the offer is closed as a return. The following errors must be
corrected before beginning the investigation:
-
The offer was submitted on an obsolete Form 656, Offer
in Compromise.
-
Balance of any TIPRA shortfall due at the time of
submission.
-
There are unfiled tax returns (generally, this will
not exceed a 6-year look-back period without managerial
approval).
-
Form 433-A(OIC) and/or 433-B(OIC) is blank, partially
completed, or missing.
Note:
An original return will not be requested if there is
already a Substitute for Return (SFR) assessment on Master
File.
-
When sending a combo letter to perfect the errors listed
above , also request the information shown below, if
necessary.
-
The taxpayer's name, physical address or taxpayer
identification number (TIN) is missing or incorrect and
cannot be determined from IDRS or other documents
submitted with the offer.
Note:
If the information can be located on IDRS or other
documents submitted with the offer, input the correct
information on AOIC and continue processing the offer.
-
An amount of money is offered, but the payment terms
are not specified.
-
The taxpayer(s) signature is missing on Form 656.
-
The offered amount is blank or zero, unless terms are
present.
-
If a tax period with an amount due is missing from the Form
656, but all tax periods due can be determined from IDRS or
other documents submitted with the offer, add the missing
periods to the AOIC MFT screen and include them on the Form
656.
-
When a taxpayer has included a tax period(s) for which
there is no apparent amount due, do not add the tax period(s)
to AOIC. Contact the taxpayer to determine if any issues are
pending that may result in additional tax.
-
If the basis for compromise is not indicated but it can be
determined by reviewing the package, begin the investigation.
-
An offer can be investigated but cannot be accepted until
all errors are corrected and/or an amended Form 656 is signed.
Therefore, offers will not be returned by the PE if the
taxpayer fails to respond to any perfection issue listed in
paragraph 2 above.
Note:
PEs must ensure all payments received have the correct
Designated Payment Codes (DPC).
5.8.3.7.1
(05-14-2013)
Case Building for COIC Offers
-
Case building for COIC cases should be minimal and will
be limited to include prints of the following in-house
research:
-
COIC will generate the TC 480 and Status 71 through the
AOIC system. However, there may be situations when the TC
480/Status 71 cannot be systemically generated (e.g., MFT 31
modules created prior to January 2005, imminent statute,
etc.). In those cases where AOIC does not systemically
generate the appropriate TC 480 and/or Status 71, COIC must
manually input the appropriate codes.
Note:
If the TC 480 was manually input it must be manually
reversed. The AOIC history should be notated to alert the
OE/OS that the TC 480 must be manually reversed at
closing.
5.8.3.8
(05-14-2013)
PE Requests for Estimated Tax Payments
-
PEs will request delinquent estimated tax (ES) payments as
part of their case building actions for all self-employed
taxpayers.
-
Determine if the taxpayer is currently self-employed. If
research indicates the taxpayer is no longer self-employed,
and has not been self-employed for the entire calendar year,
no ES payments are required.
-
In order to be considered for an OIC, the self-employed
taxpayer must be current with filing and payment requirements
in the year in which the offer was submitted. ES payments are
generally due quarterly; April 15th, June 15th, September 15th
and January 15th of the following year.
-
Self employed taxpayers are required to pay an amount equal
to their current year self employment tax liability or the
self employment tax owed in the prior year, whichever is less.
-
To determine whether ES payments are required:
-
Check IMFOLI for the current year. ES payments may be
identified by TC 640.
-
If quarterly ES payments are posted to the account,
no further action is necessary.
-
If there are no payments, or missing payments, take the
following actions
-
Check the prior year TXMOD to determine the
taxpayer's total tax liability (TC 150),
-
Subtract any withholding tax (TC 806),
-
If the result is $1,000 or more, this would be the
amount due for ES payments in the current year. If the
result is under $1,000, the taxpayer is not liable for
ES payments.
-
Divide the total amount by 4 to get the quarterly
amount due.
-
Determine the amount due up to the current date and
request the shortfall using the Combo letter, paragraph
AZ.
-
Annotate the remarks section of AOIC with your
request and schedule appropriate follow-up.
-
If an ES payment is the only corrective action requested in
the Combo letter, the offer should be assigned to 60XX. PEs will
not return the offer if the taxpayer fails to
respond.
5.8.3.9
(05-14-2013)
AOIC Combo Letter
-
The combo letter on the AOIC system is designed to
communicate with the taxpayer and/or their representative to
advise the taxpayer that their offer has been received or to
request the necessary corrective action(s).
-
If no perfection is required, issue the AOIC Combo Letter,
Paragraph A. The date of possible taxpayer contact must
reflect 120 days from the date of the Combo letter. Document
the AOIC remarks with this information.
-
If perfection is required, prepare the combo letter using
the paragraphs that address all deficiencies. Include Pub 1, Your
Rights as a Taxpayer, and Pub 594, The
IRS Collection Process.
-
Before mailing the AOIC Combo Letter to the taxpayer and
representative, if appropriate, you must ensure the
representative is authorized to receive correspondence. If a
disclosure issue exists, use the applicable paragraph to
indicate this in the AOIC Combo Letter, and do not send a copy
of the letter to the representative. Instead, send the
representative a letter notifying him or her that
correspondence has been sent to his or her client and he or
she must contact his or her client for the information.
-
Post-date all AOIC Combo Letters five (5) calendar days.
Schedule follow-up for the 45th day from the date of the
letter. This means that at least 50 calendar days (5 postdate
plus 45 calendar days from the date of the letter) will have
elapsed before an established follow-up date.
-
Envelopes containing the AOIC Combo Letter, which require a
response (Options B, C, or D), must be stamped or otherwise
marked "URGENT-TIME SENSITIVE" .
-
Document the AOIC remarks to summarize all applicable
perfection issues and the mailing date of the letter.
-
Input the appropriate follow-up date.
-
Retain a copy of the signed and dated AOIC Combo Letter in
the file.
-
Assign the offer to the applicable AOIC assignment number.
-
If there is no response to the Combo letter, the OIC may be
returned with no further contact. A return for failure to
perfect an offer does not require a Form 1271, Rejection
or Withdrawal Memorandum. The taxpayer has no
appeal rights when the offer is closed as a return. For
additional information on return reconsideration procedures
see IRM 5.8.7.3, Return
Reconsideration.
5.8.3.10
(05-14-2013)
Processing Taxpayer Responses to Combo Letters
-
If the combo letter requested critical perfection
information, but the taxpayer fails to respond, the offer may
be returned with no further contact.
-
If the offer is assigned to 51XX and the taxpayer responds,
incorporate the response into the file and assign to 5500 or
5558, as appropriate.
-
Responses received on cases assigned to 5150 (field) must
be reviewed immediately, assigned to a PE for expedite
processing, and transferred to the appropriate field drop
point.
-
All other responses must be reviewed within 10 calendar
days of assignment to the PE.
-
Upon reviewing the response, take the next appropriate
action; assign to 60XX or return.
-
If the taxpayer or their representative requests an
extension of time to comply with the request for information,
a reasonable amount of time should be granted. Document the
AOIC history indicating the new deadline for the response. If
the taxpayer and/or the representative fails to meet the
additional deadline, return the offer with no further contact.
Note:
If the only corrective action requested was for estimated
tax payments, the offer will not be
returned by the PE if the taxpayer fails to respond. See
5.8.3.8, Estimated Tax Payments,
above.
-
If the request included unfiled or delinquent returns and
the taxpayer failed to file the requested returns, provide
copies, or provide a valid reason for not filing and internal
sources do not reflect that the return(s) have been filed, the
offer may be returned with no further contact.
Note:
If the taxpayer gives an explanation supporting special
circumstances, the offer should be forwarded to 60XX for
further consideration.
-
If the request included:
-
Missing TIPRA payments,
-
Perfection of Form 656, Offer
in Compromise (current revision or related
Form 656 and applicable payments),
-
Missing Form 433-A(OIC), Collection
Information Statement for Wage Earners and Self-Employed
Individuals, and/or Form 433-B(OIC), Collection
Information Statement for Businesses,
and the taxpayer failed to provide or address the missing
payments or forms, internal research does not reflect the
payment(s) have been received, and no special circumstances
were identified, the offer may be returned with no further
contact. For additional information on return reconsideration
procedures see IRM 5.8.7.3, Return
Reconsideration.
-
Update the AOIC remarks summarizing the documents or
payments received.
-
Sign any amended or revised Forms 656 with the current
date. Retain the original and any amended Forms 656 in the
file.
-
PEs are required to initiate the next appropriate action on
cases where taxpayers have responded to the combo letter
within 10 calendar days from the date the offer is assigned to
the PE.
-
An interim letter, advising 90 days for the next taxpayer
contact, must be sent after the PE reviews the response, prior
to assignment to an OE holding inventory. Document the AOIC
Remarks that the interim letter was issued.
5.8.3.11
(05-14-2013)
Processing Telephone Responses to Combo Letters
-
PEs are responsible for answering incoming calls from
taxpayers, tax representatives and internal customers on the
COIC toll-free telephone line.
-
Generally these calls involve taxpayer inquiries regarding
the status of pending offers or questions about a letter they
received.
-
For the majority of the calls, the PE should access the
offer on AOIC and, by reviewing the remarks screen,
satisfactorily answer the taxpayer's questions.
-
There will be times when it will be necessary for the PE to
take additional follow-up actions to address the taxpayer's
concerns.
-
The table below illustrates when follow-up actions must be
taken.
-
Any additional discussions with the taxpayer or tax
representative that may require follow-up actions should be
discussed with the manager.
-
All phone calls must be well documented in the AOIC Remarks
Screen.
5.8.3.12
(05-14-2013)
No Reply Procedures
-
After the offer is determined processable and a combo
letter has been sent, the offer should be held until the
follow up date expires to allow the taxpayer to provide the
requested information.
-
If the taxpayer or their representative requests an
extension of time to comply with the request for information,
a reasonable amount of time should be granted. Document the
AOIC history indicating the new deadline for the response. If
the taxpayer and/or the representative fail to meet the
additional deadline, return the offer with no additional
contact.
-
After the designated time period has passed and no response
has been received, the "No Reply" return process
will be initiated by the COIC site designated manager. The
AOIC system will generate all the necessary letters and
documents to allow for the closing of the case off of AOIC.
-
Before closing the offer, check AOIC to verify that no
response was received. Check IDRS to ensure there is no Combat
Zone, -C Freeze, on the account. For additional information
see IRM 5.19.10.6 , Combat Zone Freeze
Codes.
-
When returning the offer:
-
Retain the original Form 656, Offer
in Compromise, any amended Forms 656, and a
copy of the return letter in the file.
-
Cross out all IRS received dates with an
"X" .
-
Stamp the Form 656 with RETURN and add the current
date.
-
Update the case remarks on AOIC, including the reason
for the return.
-
Include a copy of the history in the file and give
the file to the manager for approval.
Note:
For information on return reconsideration procedures see
IRM 5.8.7.3, Return Reconsideration.
5.8.3.13
(05-14-2013)
Processing Form 657, Offer in Compromise/Revenue Officer
Report
-
All OICs forwarded with a Form 657, Offer
in Compromise/Revenue Officer Report, will be
processed following expedite handling. See IRM 5.8.3.18, Expedite
Handling, below for additional instructions on
expedite handling.
-
If an offer was sent in by an Revenue Officer (RO) with a
Form 657 attached and the RO has determined that the OIC was
submitted solely to delay collection, the COIC site will
contact the originating RO to advise when the return letter
has been issued. Unless a jeopardy situation exists, the RO
must wait for COIC notification that the return letter has
been issued before taking any collection enforcement action.
See IRM 5.8.4.20, Offer Submitted
Solely to Delay Collection, for solely to delay
procedures.
-
If the offer account is in Status 26 and the Form 657 was
not received, the COIC site will contact the RO to request
Form 657 and continue processing the offer.
-
If a taxpayer or POA contacts the COIC site concerning an
offer returned as solely to delay based on an RO
recommendation, the call should be referred to the field
Collection RO group manager.
5.8.3.13.1
(05-14-2013)
Offers Submitted Solely to Delay Collection per Forms 657
-
When an RO determines that an offer is submitted solely
to delay collection, the offer can be returned to the
taxpayer without further consideration.
Note:
The term solely to delay collection is defined as an
offer that was submitted for the sole purpose of avoiding
or delaying collection activity. See IRM 5.8.4.20, Offer
Submitted Solely to Delay Collection, for
examples of solely to delay.
-
The field OIC group manager and the COIC Unit Manager
have delegated authority to approve returns based on solely
to delay collection.
-
An OIC is not considered submitted solely to delay
collection just because there is an imminent CSED issue or
if an offer has been rejected after investigation and the
taxpayer exercises appeal rights.
5.8.3.13.2
(05-14-2013)
PE Procedures for Processing Forms 657 Submitted Solely to
Delay
-
The COIC site will:
-
Screen out all Forms 657,
Offer in Compromise/Revenue Officer Report,
-
Make all Forms 657 a priority,
-
Promptly process, and
-
Immediately return the offer as solely to delay
collection.
-
Form 657 serves to establish coordination between the
field Collection RO group, the offer group, and the COIC
site to provide case documentation regarding these
determinations, and to ensure collection action is not
pursued until the offer is closed.
-
If the COIC unit manager agrees with the determination,
the COIC manager or employee will contact the originating
field Collection RO to advise that the return letter has
been issued.
-
If the COIC unit manager disagrees with the
determination, discussions should be initiated with the
field Collection RO manager to reach an agreeable solution.
-
Once the return letter is sent and the case reassigned to
the field Collection RO, then the field Collection RO
assigned the case must initiate appropriate collection
action in accordance with IRM 5.1.10.8, Timely
Follow Ups.
5.8.3.14
(05-14-2013)
Input and Verification of TC 480
-
The PE must verify that the TC 480 has posted to each tax
period shown on the Form 656.
-
If the TC 480 has not posted, it must be manually input. If
a manual input is required, document the AOIC history
indicating that the TC 480 must be manually reversed at
closing.
-
The table below provides instruction for inputting the TC
480.
5.8.3.15
(05-14-2013)
Dishonored Payments
-
For payments processed through Paper Check Conversion (PCC)
Cincinnati Accounting receives the initial notification of a
dishonored OIC payment from the Federal Reserve Bank through
the Electronic Verification and Image Services (ELVIS)
automated system.
-
The Cincinnati Dishonored Check Unit will notify the
taxpayer by mailing them a copy of the dishonored check and
Form 12993-A, Check for Offer in
Compromise Payment Not Accepted by Bank.
-
Cincinnati Accounting will fax copies of the dishonored
payments to the COIC site that originated Form 3210, Document
Transmittal .
-
Notification of dishonored payments that are processed
through Remittance Strategy-Paper Check Conversion ( RS-PCC)
will originate from Ogden Accounting.
-
Upon notification of a dishonored application fee and/or
TIPRA payment, the site will determine the current AOIC offer
assignment.
-
If the payment has been moved from the 4710 Account to the
Master File, the Dishonored Check Unit will reverse the
payment with a TC 671. If no notification of the dishonored
payment is received, the dishonored check can also be
identified by the TC 671 posted on IDRS.
-
Upon notification of a dishonored application fee and/or
TIPRA payment, the offer will be immediately returned to the
taxpayer with the appropriate AOIC letter for a dishonored
check. Document the AOIC history with the following
information:
-
Which check(s) (application fee, TIPRA payment, or
both) was returned,
-
The check number; and
-
Date the check was dishonored
-
There may be no notification of dishonored checks processed
through RS-PCC. Check IDRS for the posting of a TC 671 that
may also include a secondary TC 280 or TC 286, dishonored
check penalty.
-
If the payment was dishonored while still in the 4710
account, Accounting will annotate their copy of the Form 3210
as appropriate.
-
If the taxpayer or an authorized representative offers to
replace the dishonored check and requests reconsideration of
their offer, contact by the taxpayer or their representative
must be made within 30 days of the date of the initial AOIC
return letter. The replacement payment must be in the form of
certified funds (money order, cashier check, etc.) and
received within a reasonable amount of time. See IRM 5.8.7, Return,
Terminate, Withdraw, and Reject Processing, for
reconsideration procedures.
-
When contacted:
-
Inform the taxpayer or the authorized representative
that the offer will not be reconsidered if the payment
is not made with certified funds.
-
A due date for receipt of the payment must be
provided to the taxpayer or the authorized
representative.
-
Advise the taxpayer or their representative to submit
the payment by overnight mail.
-
Document the case history.
-
Inform the taxpayer or the authorized representative that
the certified funds must be mailed to either of the following
addresses:
Brookhaven: Mail Stop 681, PO Box 9011, Holtsville, NY
11742
Memphis: AMC-Stop 880, PO Box 30834, Memphis, TN
38130-0834
-
To ensure proper handling, advise the taxpayer to include a
letter requesting reconsideration of the offer.
-
If the payment was dishonored while still residing in the
4710 Account, the payment should be processed through
established deposit procedures. A copy of Form 3210 must be
forwarded to the appropriate MOIC function. Clearly indicate
on the copy of Form 3210 that the payment is a replacement for
a dishonored check. MOIC will load the payment on the AOIC
deposit screen once the AOIC record is reloaded. MOIC is
responsible for ensuring the payment is applied to the Master
File as originally intended.
Note:
The offer will be reloaded, and a new offer number will
generate. The new Form 3210 will reflect the new offer
number. Cross reference the original offer number in the
AOIC history, and in the remarks section of Form 3210 to
ensure Accounting is aware there may be two Forms 3210 with
different offer numbers for the same taxpayer.
-
If the payment was dishonored with a TC 671 on the Master
File, prepare a Form 3244, Payment
Posting Voucher, to post the payment as a
replacement for the dishonored payment.
-
Upon receipt of the replacement payment, the employee that
processes the payment must also:
-
Reload the offer on AOIC, if appropriate.
-
Verify if the payment was received within the
established deadline as annotated in the AOIC remarks.
-
If the payment is not received by the specified due date,
the payment will be processed in accordance with TIPRA payment
requirements, and the case will not be opened as a
reconsideration. See IRM 5.8.7.3, Return
Reconsideration, for reconsideration procedures.
5.8.3.15.1
(05-14-2013)
Additional Procedures for Dishonored Payments
-
If the offer is still assigned to a COIC site, COIC will
immediately cease processing the associated offer, update
AOIC and return it to the taxpayer, utilizing letter option
RET-AA.
-
If the offer is assigned to an Area office, COIC will
telephone the employee assigned the offer (or the manager of
the assigned function, if no individual is specified on AOIC)
to advise of the dishonored payment. Once contact is made
with the assigned area employee or manager, COIC will fax a
copy of the dishonored check to include in the case file and
document AOIC to indicate to whom the information was
communicated.
-
If the case was processed as an Appeals CDP offer, COIC
should query the Appeals Centralized Database System (ACDS)
to determine which Appeals employee is assigned the case.
COIC will telephone the Appeals employee to advise of the
dishonored check and fax a copy to include in the Appeals
case file. COIC will update the AOIC.
-
If notification of the dishonored check occurs after the
offer was closed on AOIC, the designated AOIC liaison within
the COIC site will contact the Headquarters AOIC analyst to
correct the application fee record of the closed offer.
5.8.3.16
(05-14-2013)
"Application Fee Refund/Apply Listing" Validation
-
When an erroneous processability determination is corrected
after forwarding the related application fee remittance for
deposit, the COIC sites will need to determine whether the
remittance has been deposited and credited to the taxpayer’s
liability. An application Fee Refund/Apply Listing should be
generated from AOIC to identify application fees that were
initially determined to be processable, but later determined
to be not processable. Generation of this listing is required
in order for the COIC site to verify and authorize a manual
refund.
-
The COIC sites should request MOIC to generate the
Application Fee Refund/Apply Listing on a monthly basis.
-
Generally, when an offer is deemed not processable, the
Service includes the taxpayer's application fee, and in some
cases the initial TIPRA payment, see IRM 5.8.2.3, Processability,
with the return disposition letter. However, depending on the
elapsed time between inputting a processability change on AOIC
from "Y" to an "N" , the Service may have
already deposited the related application fee and applied the
payment to the taxpayer's liability on Master File.
Note:
The comments recorded on the Form 5792 must specifically
state that the offer was deemed not processable and the
taxpayer is entitled to the refund of the application fee.
Include a contact name and number on the Form 5792 to
provide Accounting a contact if questions should arise.
-
To determine whether or not a manual refund of the
application fee should be issued, research the completed Form
3210, Document Transmittal,
to determine whether the application fee was deposited by the
Service or returned to the taxpayer via manual refund
procedures.
-
Thorough research and care is required when determining
which offers on the application Fee Refund/Apply Listing
should receive manual refunds.
-
To request the MOIC function to issue manual refunds,
prepare a memorandum that includes:
-
Records that support the COIC sites decision to either
remove the offer record from the Refund/Apply Listing or to
issue a manual refund must be retained for one year. At a
minimum, the file should consist of:
-
Copies of the Refund/Apply Listing or a memorandum
detailing the requested information,
-
Copies of the Form 3210 and
-
Any other supporting documentation necessary to
support the decision, including, but not limited to, the
Remittance Processing System daily remittance registers.
-
TIPRA does not allow refunds of periodic payments. However,
it does allow refunds of the application fee, the initial
TIPRA payment in limited circumstances, see IRM 5.8.2.3 , Processability,
and any deposits the taxpayer may have made.
-
All IDRS manual refunds must be monitored to ensure they
are issued to the taxpayer and to avoid duplicate refunds.
-
When a manual refund is generated:
-
Open an IDRS control base and place in "M"
status.
-
The status of the refund must be updated weekly on
the Manual Refund listing.
-
Monitor open controls until posting of the TC 840.
-
Close IDRS control when the manual refund has posted.
Note:
For additional information see IRM 21.4.4.5.1, Monitoring
Manual Refunds.
5.8.3.17
(05-14-2013)
Expedite Handling
-
There may be occasions where a taxpayer or Power of
Attorney requests expedited processing of their OIC due to an
emergency or perceived emergency situation. Situations that
may warrant expedited case processing include (but are not
limited to):
-
A contract or business agreement requiring the
taxpayer, as a condition of the contract or agreement,
to resolve the tax liability by a specific date,
-
Availability of the money to fund the offer is
limited to a certain time; and
-
A terminal illness may affect the ability to complete
the payment terms.
Note:
Contact by phone, fax, or mail may identify an emergency
situation not initiated by the taxpayer. Once identified,
expedite processing may become necessary. Follow the
procedures in paragraphs (3) and (4) below and discuss with
your manager.
-
Processing Forms 656, Offer in
Compromise, must be given priority consideration
and handled expeditiously due to pending collection action.
-
Offers received with a request for expedited processing
should be referred to management for a decision on whether or
not expedited treatment is warranted.
-
If a decision is made to expedite offer processing, the
manager should document the AOIC history indicating the basis
for the decision. Form 656 should be clearly labeled at the
top "Emergency Processing Requested." Immediate
processability and assignment for investigation should be
made.
-
Every effort should be made to close the offer within 90
calendar days of receipt. In an attempt to bring the case to a
prompt and timely resolution and to meet the special needs of
the taxpayer, immediate contact should be made with the
taxpayer to request any additional information needed.
-
If a decision is made not to expedite the case, the manager
should document the basis for the decision on the AOIC
history. Contact the taxpayer by telephone or correspondence
explaining the basis for the decision. The case should be
worked under routine processing.
5.8.3.17.1
(05-14-2013)
Expedite Handling for Short Collection Statute Expiration
Dates on Related Offers
-
The Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED) is ten
years from the date of a tax assessment.
-
PEs are responsible for ensuring there are no tax
liabilities with less than one year remaining on the CSED
for any offer received that will require a request for a
related offer prior to acceptance. CSED dates can be found
on the AOIC MFT screen and on the IDRS prints in the case
files.
-
If any CSED is identified that is less than one year from
the date the offer was received and there are no perfection
issues:
-
Document AOIC Remarks screen,
-
Send Combo A to the taxpayer and representative, if
applicable and
-
Give case file to manager to be expedited to an OE.
Note:
If case is to be transferred to the field, write:
"Expedite - Short CSED" , on the front of the
case folder.
-
If a CSED is identified that is less than one year from
the date the offer was received and perfection of the offer
is required:
-
Send a Combo letter to request the needed
perfection,
-
Document the AOIC Remarks screen and
-
Flag case for expedited handling,
-
When the response is received, give case file to
the manager to be expedited to an OE.
-
If no response is received, return offer following IRM
5.8.3.12, No Reply
Procedures.
Note:
If case is to be transferred to the field, write:
"Expedite - Short CSED" , on the front of the
case folder.
5.8.3.18
(05-14-2013)
Third Party Authorizations
-
Taxpayers who wish to be represented must submit a properly
executed Form 2848, Power of Attorney
and Declaration of Representative. Input the
representative's information on AOIC and retain a copy of the
form in the paper case file. Forward the original for
recording on the Centralized Authorization File (CAF).
-
Send all original correspondence to the taxpayer and
provide a copy to the representative if the taxpayer has
checked the box in Part 2 of Form 2848.
-
Individuals who are not authorized to practice before the
IRS with respect to a collection matter (such as unenrolled
return preparers and registered tax return preparers) may
accompany taxpayers to meetings with a completed Form 8821, Taxpayer
Information Authorization, or other proper
authorization, and receive and provide information that
relates to the offer investigation. They are not authorized to
represent the taxpayers or sign documents relating to offers
in compromise. See IRM 5.1.10.6.2, Right
to Representation.
-
If the offer contains liabilities for tax years or periods
that are not also included on Form 2848, a letter cannot be
sent to the representative covering these periods. Instead,
send a redacted letter to the representative. The letter sent
to the taxpayer can request completion of a Form 8821 or a
Form 2848 to cover the missing periods.
-
If, during the investigation, it is discovered that the POA
no longer represents the taxpayer, secure a letter revoking
the POA and document the case history. Remove the POA
information from AOIC.
-
Where a recognized representative has unreasonably delayed
or hindered an examination, collection, or investigation by
failing to furnish, after repeated requests, non-privileged
information necessary to the examination, collection or
investigation, the IRS employee conducting the examination,
collection, or investigation may be given permission to bypass
the representative and contact the taxpayer directly for such
information [26 C.F.R. § 601.506 (b) (Statement of Procedural
Rules)]. Prior to contacting the taxpayer directly, the IRS
employee must first initiate bypass procedures. See IRM
5.1.23.5, By-Passing a Taxpayer's
Representative, for procedures to bypass a POA.
5.8.3.18.1
(05-14-2013)
Third Party Authorization Requests
-
During the course of the investigation, a taxpayer may
submit a Form 2848 designating a third-party as their
representative or power of attorney, or the taxpayer may
submit a Form 8821 designating an appointee or may complete
Section 11 of Form 656, Offer in
Compromise, for a Third Party Designee. When
properly completed and filed by the taxpayer, each of these
documents should be recognized during an investigation, and
interaction with the third party should be governed by the
parameters allowed within each of these authorization forms.
-
Form 2848 - authorizes an eligible individual
(e.g., attorney, CPA, enrolled agent, or enrolled
actuary) to represent a taxpayer before the IRS and
allows the individual to receive confidential
information.
-
Form 8821 authorizes any individual, corporation,
or partnership to inspect and/or receive a taxpayer's
confidential information for the type of tax and the
years listed on Form 8821, Item 3.
-
Section 11 of Form 656 allows a third party
designee to discuss the offer with the IRS and allows
the IRS to discuss with the designee any additional
information needed to process the offer.
-
The table below provides guidance to assist in
distinguishing the differences between the Form 2848, Form
8821, and item 14 on the Form 656.
5.8.3.18.2
(05-14-2013)
Form 8821, Tax Information Authorization (Rev. 10/2011)
-
If Form 8821 is missing critical information that can
only be provided by the taxpayer (e.g., tax years, type of
tax, missing taxpayer signature, date), return to the
taxpayer.
-
Information that may be disclosed to the designee is
limited to the type of tax, tax form number, tax years or
periods, or specific tax matter that is listed on the Form
8821, item 3.
-
If Form 8821, item 5a is checked, the designee is also
entitled to receive copies of tax information, notices, and
other written communication on an ongoing basis for the type
of tax, tax form number, tax years, or specific tax matter
listed under item 3.
-
The designee is not authorized to respond to any type of
correspondence on behalf of the taxpayer if the response
advocates a position that would indicate that the designee
is taking on a representational role.
-
Mail the original Form 8821 to the appropriate
Centralized Authorization File (CAF) campus in Memphis,
Ogden, or Philadelphia (International), depending on the
taxpayer’s state of residence. Page 2 of Form 8821
provides mailing addresses to be used.
-
Form 8821 may also be faxed. Refer to page 2 of Form 8821
for detailed fax information. If the form is faxed, retain
the original in the case file. Document the history to
indicate the date and campus to which the form was sent.
5.8.3.18.3
(05-14-2013)
Form 656, Offer in Compromise, Section 11: Third Party
Designee (Rev. 5/2012)
-
The information and/or documentation that may be
disclosed to the designee is limited only to information
and/or documentation necessary to process an offer.
-
Information may include tax liabilities omitted on the
Form 656 or unfiled tax returns affecting the acceptance of
the offer.
5.8.3.18.4
(05-14-2013)
Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of
Representative (Rev. 3/2012)
-
As of March 2004, the IRS will not honor a Form 2848, Power
of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, if
it designates a representative who is not authorized to
practice before the IRS. Further, the form will not be
treated as a Taxpayer Information Authorization. Form 8821, Taxpayer
Information Authorization, is required to allow
those individuals, who cannot practice before Collection
personnel to access tax information beyond what would be
allowed if they completed Section 11 of Form 656, Offer
in Compromise.
-
Taxpayers may authorize a student who works in a Low
Income Taxpayer Clinic (LITC) or Student Tax Clinic Program
(STCP) to represent them under a special order issued by the
Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). A copy of the
letter from OPR authorizing practice before the IRS must be
attached to Form 2848. Students who have been authorized to
practice by a special order may, subject to any limitations
set forth in the letter from OPR, represent taxpayers before
any IRS office and should be treated the same as any other
taxpayer representative designated on Form 2848.
-
The power to sign the taxpayer's tax returns can be
granted only in limited situations. Refer to Form 2848 and
Treasury Regulations 1.6012-1(a)(5) and 1.6061-1(a) for
additional information.
-
If a joint return has been filed, one or both spouses may
choose to be represented by a POA. However, beginning in
October, 2011, If both spouses choose to be represented by
the same individual(s) or different individuals, both the
husband and wife are required to file and sign separate
Forms 2848. If only one spouse is to be represented, only
the one that will be represented is required to sign the
Form 2848. Regardless, any authorized representative of
either spouse is allowed access to tax information related
to the joint tax return.
-
Mail or fax Form 2848 to the appropriate Centralized
Authorization File (CAF) campus in Memphis, Ogden, or
Philadelphia (International) depending on the taxpayer's
state of residence. Refer to the Instructions on the Form
2848 for mailing addresses and fax numbers. If the Form 2848
is faxed, retain the original in the case file. Document the
case to indicate the date and campus to which the form was
sent.
5.8.3.19
(05-14-2013)
Processing Forms 4844 from Automated Collection Services, Toll
Free, or Other Service Divisions
-
Form 4844, Request for Terminal
Action, will be prepared by Automated Collection
System (ACS), Toll Free, and Walk-in operations to provide
information submitted by the taxpayer on a previously filed
offer in compromise. Normally, these forms will be prepared if
the taxpayer has yet to be contacted or notified of the status
of the offer within 45 calendar days of the offer being
submitted for processing.
-
Form 4844 will be faxed to the appropriate COIC sites. The
forms should be reviewed within 48 hours of receipt and any
necessary action taken on the account based on the information
provided.
Exhibit 5.8.3-1
Form 3210 – To Appeals with Open TIPRA Statute
Appeals Transmittal used for transmitting OICs worked in
conjunction with a CDP.
-- -- --
Above Per IRS Web Site 20140120
| The above
limited information is intended for
informational purposes only. If legal advice or other expert
assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should
be sought, and this general information should not be relied upon
without such professional assistance. |
|
If Adobe Acrobat is
needed to view the above forms. A free version of Acrobat
Reader is available by
clicking here.
CAUTION: There are many providers of services on the
internet who will submit your Offer in Compromise forms.
However, such providers merely have you complete the forms.
These bargain basement "Offer experts" may be only
mailing the forms you prepare to the Internal Revenue Service.
Thus, they have done nothing for you. In fact, they may end up
costing you more because critical review and analysis has not
been done. When completing the financial statement forms and
making the Offer, you are painting a financial picture that will
determine the amount of an acceptable Offer. Unless your
representative has the necessary skills and experience, you may
have paid a small fee, only to be subjected to settling for more
under the Offer than you otherwise should have. Your
professional must have experience in: calculating your income
and expenses; determining the amount of the offer you should
make; valuing your assets and liabilities; reviewing joint
ownership considerations; working with the tax law and IRS
internal procedures; arguing the facts and the law, and
negotiating with the IRS.
The IRS has a history of intimidation, and let's face it,
they will take advantage of any taxpayer who represents himself,
and even a taxpayer's advocate who is weak. Remember, IRS Offer
Specialists generally have "collection" backgrounds
and they come at you from the perspective of getting as much
money as they can.
In the end analysis, you should measure the benefits
you derive from the final result. For a taxpayer to engage
someone who merely mails in your Offer forms for a
"bargain" fee,
what at first blush looked like "such a deal", may in
reality end up costing you many thousands of dollars more
because you didn't choose a tax professional who would negotiate
the best settlement for you.
|
| For
assistance please
contact A. Nathan Zeliff, Attorney at Law |
TO
MAIN PAGE
|